| Task: We have been asked to consider the status of our practice with regards the learning outcomes which are as follows: LO1: Process: Negotiate photographic and lens-based imaging techniques according to self-initiated objectives. LO2 research: Determine appropriate research methods and methodologies to develop, produce, inform and critically underpin your creative practice LO4 Context: Assess and analyse the impact of historical and contemporary themes and current visual practices on your practical work and the work of others. With regards to process, I have chosen to execute this module’s assignment predominantly in medium format film. This has necessitated a return to learning craft skills not revisited since my earlier practice several decades ago before the advent of digital. This has involved a re-learning of for example the finer points of the zone system and how I might apply them as well as the purchase of a Sekonic 580 light meter in order to utilise my learning effectively. I have also had to study the various pitfalls of medium format capture such as mirror slap and the importance of using a tripod where necessary. Previously I would have hand held. Overall a significant slowing down in the process was necessary but on reflection a much-needed prompt after the over-zealous pace that digital capture encourages. Another area of renewed study has been in post-processing where I have had to re-learn the full skill set required for negative processing and for the first time the techniques of digital scanning and conversion. Overall the process has necessitated a return to the fundamentals. With regards LO2 research, this module has introduced us to numerous fundamental new concepts. Many of these I have somehow remained unaware of until now. I had previously only glossed over the concept of image meaning in my practice. The simple phrase ‘a photograph about something’ rather than ‘a photograph of something’ is now indelibly imprinted in my memory and will constantly push me to create better more meaningful work. The idea of constructed imagery was a new one for me. The work of Gregory Crewdson and others was something of a revelation. I now have this idea as a possible tool going forward when evaluating ideas for new work. In the final weeks, we discussed the many facets of the gaze. This was not new for me. In being informed by the work of Richard Avedon in the first module for my assignment, I has already reviewed many aspects of the gaze. I also studied the views expressed by commentators such as Susan Sontag on the inequalities of power when approaching less fortunate groups as subjects. Finally, with regard LO4 context, I have started and intend to continue my contextual research of practitioners such as Todd Hido and Robert Darch amongst others. I have found the Aperture series particularly insightful. I have also been researching in less obvious areas such as the book by Susan Bowering on melancholia. Although this was not a source exclusively about photography, nonetheless its description of the visual cues of Melancholia were particularly relevant to the completion of my assignment. |
The Photography of David Rosen
Fusing Documentary Photography, Long-Form Photojournalism & Social Research
The Photography of David Rosen 